Besuch der Casino Company an der Sunshine Coast, gefördert von der Regierung von Queensland

Die Regierung von Queensland bestätigte, dass sie den jüngsten Besuch von Führungskräften des malaysischen DrückGlück Casino-Betreibers NagaCorp, dem lokalen Nachrichtensender der Sunshine Coast Daily , auf dem Gelände des Maroochydore Central Business District beworben hatte.

Das Maroochydore CBD, das derzeit im zentralen Teil der Sunshine Coast (in der kleinen Stadt Maroochydore) entwickelt wird, soll ein millionenschwerer Komplex mit gemischter Nutzung sein, der sich über 53 Hektar Land erstreckt .

Nach Fertigstellung werden verschiedene Gebäude, Lebensmittel- und Getränkeeinrichtungen, Einzelhandelsflächen, eine Reihe von Bürogebäuden und ein neues Rathausgebäude entstehen

Die Entwicklungsministerin der Tourismusindustrie in Queensland, Kate Jones, hat bestätigt, dass der Besuch des CBD im November 2017 von der staatlichen Abteilung für Sonderprojekte gefördert wurde, die vor den letzten Wahlen in Queensland Teil des Ministeriums für staatliche Entwicklung war. Sie hat auch lokalen Medien mitgeteilt, dass sich Mitglieder der Einheit getroffen haben und sich mit internationalen Investoren treffen werden, um die Tourismusentwicklung im Staat zu fördern und zu fördern .

Der Abgeordnete von Queensland hat weiter erklärt, dass der Besuch von NagaCorp zu Teil ihrer Initiative war, um ausländische Investoren für potenzielle Investitionen in die Tourismusbranche des Staates zu gewinnen. Der malaysische Hotel- und Casino-Betreiber erhielt Informationen über den Tourismussektor in Queensland sowie über das Global Tourism Hubs-Programm des Staates und die Anforderungen, die ein Investor erfüllen muss, um an diesem Programm teilnehmen zu können.

Im Allgemeinen wurden die Global Tourism Hubs von staatlichen Politikern als gemischt genutzte Immobilien mit Hotel-, Lebensmittel- und Getränke-, Unterhaltungs- und Casinoeinrichtungen definiert. Ein solcher Hub soll in Cairns entwickelt werden. Nach ersten Schätzungen wird das Projekt 1 Milliarde AUD kosten und ein Casino umfassen . Nach jüngsten Informationen der Regierung haben 12 lokale und internationale Investoren Interesse an einer Teilnahme an dem Projekt angemeldet. Es wurde auch festgestellt, dass große Casino-Unternehmen unter diesen 12 waren.

Wachsender Druck gegen Maroochydore Casino

Während die Hinzufügung eines Casinos zur CBD-Entwicklung von Maroochydore nie bestätigt wurde, hatten lokale Medien zuvor berichtet, dass die Idee vom Bürgermeister von Sunshine Coast, Mark Jamieson, aufgeschlagen worden war .

In den letzten Monaten wurde der Stadtbeamte sowohl von staatlichen als auch von föderalen Politikern unter Druck gesetzt, im Rahmen des CBD-Bauprojekts keine Pläne für einen Spielort zu machen.

Herr Jamieson hat den lokalen Medien mitgeteilt, dass es nichts Falsches gibt, wenn NagaCorp Sunshine Coast besucht und sich für die Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten der Region interessiert. Der Bürgermeister wies ferner darauf hin, dass der Besuch des Casino-Unternehmens von der Landesregierung und nicht von Sunshine Coast gefördert worden sei und dass eine mögliche Hinzufügung eines Casinos im Rahmen des Maroochydore-Entwicklungsprojekts nur von der Regierung von Queensland und nicht von entschieden werden könne der Stadtrat.

Bitcoin supera in modo decisivo la resistenza

Bitcoin è uscito da un triangolo ascendente.

C’è supporto a $ 15.800.

BTC è probabilmente nella sub-ondata finale della quinta ondata

Voglio sapere di più? Unisciti al nostro gruppo Telegram e ottieni segnali di trading, un corso di trading gratuito e comunicazioni quotidiane con i fan delle criptovalute!

Il Trust Project è un consorzio internazionale di testate giornalistiche che stabiliscono standard di trasparenza.

Il prezzo del Bitcoin (BTC) è finalmente uscito dall’area di resistenza di $ 15.800 e ha raggiunto un massimo di quasi $ 16.500.

Mentre potrebbe verificarsi una diminuzione a breve termine per convalidare l’area come supporto, non sembra che BTC abbia ancora raggiunto un massimo.

Bitcoin scoppia

Il prezzo del Bitcoin è stato scambiato al di sotto dell’area di resistenza di $ 15.800 dal 5 novembre. Dopo aver creato un triangolo ascendente, il prezzo è stato finalmente in grado di rompere ieri, raggiungendo un massimo di $ 16.494 prima di diminuire leggermente.

È probabile che l’area di $ 15.800 ora funga da supporto e coincida anche con una linea di supporto ascendente.

A breve termine, BTC ha iniziato a mostrare debolezza. Dopo aver creato due candelabri ribassisti engulfing, il prezzo ha creato un pattern a stella serale , che normalmente è considerato un pattern di inversione ribassista.

Pertanto, è possibile che il prezzo ripercorra per convalidare l’area di $ 15.800 come supporto, insieme alla linea di supporto ascendente, prima di spostarsi verso l’alto.

Nonostante il breakout, il trend quotidiano ha iniziato a mostrare debolezza sotto forma di una considerevole divergenza ribassista nell’RSI, anch’esso in territorio di ipercomprato.

Tuttavia, né il MACD né lo Stochastic Oscillator mostrano alcuna debolezza.

Inoltre, il prezzo ha raggiunto il livello di resistenza di 0,786 Fib a $ 16.140 misurando dal prezzo massimo storico del 2017.

Combinando questo con la divergenza ribassista, mostra che BTC si sta probabilmente avvicinando al massimo del suo movimento al rialzo.

Se l’aumento continua, il livello di resistenza successivo si trova a $ 17.264.

Análisis de efectivo de Bitcoin: Acercándose a la próxima explosión alcista crucial

El precio en efectivo de Bitcoin comenzó un nuevo aumento después de probar el soporte de 230 dólares contra el dólar americano.

El precio vuelve a estar por encima de la resistencia de $245 y probando el promedio móvil simple de 55 (4 horas).
Hay una importante línea de tendencia bajista que se forma con una resistencia cercana a los $258 en el gráfico de 4 horas del par BCH/USD (datos de Coinbase).
Es probable que el par comience un fuerte repunte si supera los niveles de resistencia de $255 y $258.

El precio en efectivo de Bitcoin está ganando impulso por encima de los $245, similar al de Bitcoin frente al dólar americano. El BCH/USD está intentando actualmente una crucial ruptura alcista por encima de los $255 y $258.
Análisis del precio en efectivo de Bitcoin

Esta semana, el precio del efectivo de Bitcoin Profit encontró un fuerte soporte cerca de la zona de los 230 dólares contra el dólar. El precio del BCH comenzó un nuevo aumento y rompió los niveles de resistencia de 240 y 245 dólares.

El precio incluso subió por encima del nivel de retroceso del 23.6% de la caída de los $271 a los $231 de la caída. Los toros están ganando fuerza y el precio ahora muestra signos positivos por encima del nivel de resistencia de $250.

Además, el precio se está negociando justo por encima del nivel de retroceso del 50% de fibrilación del movimiento descendente desde el máximo de $271 hasta el mínimo de $231. Sin embargo, el precio se enfrenta a una fuerte resistencia cercana a los $255, $258 y al promedio móvil simple de 55 (4 horas).

También hay una importante línea de tendencia bajista que se forma con una resistencia cercana a los $258 en el gráfico de 4 horas del par BCH/USD. El precio debe romper la resistencia de $255, el promedio móvil simple de 55 (4 horas), y la línea de tendencia bajista para iniciar un fuerte repunte en el corto plazo.

Si lo logran, hay posibilidades de un aumento constante hacia el nivel de resistencia de $265 y $270. Cualquier otra ganancia podría llevarla hacia el nivel de 280 dólares. Por el contrario, podría haber un nuevo descenso por debajo del nivel de 250 dólares.

Un soporte inicial en la bajada está cerca de los 245 dólares. El soporte principal está cerca del nivel de 238 dólares, por debajo del cual el precio podría volver a la zona de soporte de 230 dólares.

Mirando el gráfico, el precio del dinero en efectivo de Bitcoin está ganando terreno por encima de los niveles de $245 y $250. En general, es probable que el precio comience un fuerte repunte si supera los niveles de resistencia de $255 y $258.

Indicadores técnicos

  • 4 horas MACD – El MACD para el BCH/USD está ganando lentamente ritmo en la zona alcista.
  • 4 horas RSI (Relative Strength Index) – El RSI para el BCH/USD está subiendo actualmente por encima del nivel 50.
  • Niveles de soporte claves – $245 y $240.
  • Niveles de resistencia claves – $255 y $258.

Bitcoin on kupla, joka antaa jatkuvasti

Kun bitcoin-hinta nousi yli viimeisen viikon aikana 13 400 dollaria, vanha keskustelu on herännyt uudelleen: Onko se kupla ja räjähtääkö se?

Bitcoinille leimattiin kupla jo varhaisimmista päivistä. Kuplaepiteetti ilmestyi vuonna 2013, kun se oli vain 266 dollaria, ja se on toistettu lähes joka vuosi siitä lähtien.

Se näytti vastustavan perinteistä sijoitusymmärrystä. Osakearvot perustuvat tulokseen ja joukkovelkakirjat korkomaksuihin. Bitcoinilla, kuten kullalla, ei ole tällaista perustaa. Kuinka sitten selitämme sen poikkeuksellisen suorituskyvyn uudena voimavarana?

Kaksi tekijää auttaa selittämään tätä:

Sen laajempi käyttöönotto, mukaan lukien suuret institutionaaliset sijoittajat; ja
Sen suhteellinen niukkuus (lyötään vain 21 miljoonaa kolikkoa).

Fiat-valuutat, kuten randi ja Yhdysvaltain dollari, kärsivät kaikista keskitetysti valvottujen valuuttojen heikkouksista, jotka on kirjattu takaisin Rooman ja jopa Babylonian aikoihin. Hallitsijat, jotka hallitsevat näitä valuuttoja, eivät vain näytä auttavan itseään – he lopulta paisuttavat tiensä unohduksiin tulostamalla lisää kolikoita, mikä rikkoo niukkuusperiaatetta kaiken hyvän rahan ytimessä.

Yhdysvaltain rahastonhoitaja ja kiistanalainen Peter Schiff, joka ei ole koskaan ollut suuri bitcoinfani, twiittasi viime viikolla: “Jos mitat omaisuuskuplien koon sen perusteella, kuinka vakuuttavia ostajilla on kaupassaan, bitcoin-kupla on suurin mitä olen nähnyt . Bitcoinin haltijat ovat varmempia siitä, että he ovat oikeassa ja varma, että he eivät voi menettää kuin dot-com- tai talonostajat näiden kuplien aikana. „

Bitcoinin haltijat ovat varmempia siitä, että he ovat oikeassa ja varma, että he eivät voi menettää kuin dot-com- tai talonostajat näiden kuplien aikana

Onko Schiff oikeassa bitcoin-kuplassa? Vaikuttaa siltä, ​​että hän voi olla, mutta ei sillä tavalla kuin hän kuvittelee.

„Bitcoinin perustamisesta lähtien monet älykkäät sijoittajat ovat havainneet, että se näyttää olevan kupla. He ovat oikeampi kuin tietävät. Jos määritämme kupla-omaisuuden arvoksi, joka on yliarvostettu suhteessa sisäiseen arvoon, voimme ajatella kaikkia rahallisia varoja kupla-varoina „, kirjoittaa Matt Huang äskettäisessä Paradigm-tutkimuksessa.

Nobel-palkittu Robert Shiller huomautti, että kulta on kupla, joka on kestänyt tuhansia vuosia. Sillä on joitain teollisia käyttötarkoituksia, mutta sen arvo on taustalla oleva arvo on vakaumus. „Voimme ajatella rahaa kuplana, joka ei koskaan ponnahtaa (tai joka ei ole vielä ponnahtanut), ja fiat-valuutan, kullan tai bitcoinin arvon luotettavana kollektiiviseen uskoon“, Huang kirjoittaa.

Growing your cryptomoney… but not without risks – What is yield farming?

The DeFi ecosystem is constantly being talked about. In the space of a few months, the funds involved in the protocols that make it up have been multiplied by ten. With this craze, a new phenomenon has appeared: yield farming. Let’s take a look back at this practice which is setting DeFi on fire.

History of yield farming

Before we understand the phenomenon of yield farming, let’s take a look at the emergence of this term.

At the end of 2019, more and more protocols hosted on Ethereum will begin to be talked about. Uniswap, Compound or Aave, their names are probably not unknown to you.

These protocols have come to the forefront with an interesting value proposition: offering users classic financial services in a decentralised manner.

Thus, all of these protocols offer benefits to their users who have deposited cryptomoney in the protocol’s liquidity pools.

Until now, the mechanisms were relatively basic: you deposited cryptomoney on the protocols and were rewarded with fees, whether they were generated by exchanges in the case of Uniswap or generated by loans taken out by other users of the protocol.

However, everything changed with the arrival of the Uniswap pool subsidised by Synthetix. Thus, Synthetix wished to find a way to encourage users to provide liquidity when they exit the sETH/ETH pool on Uniswap. To do so, Synthetix began rewarding the first participants with SNX tokens. As a result, the suppliers in the pool generated two types of rewards:

Rewards from the exchange fees generated by the pool,
SNX rewards from Synthetix incentives.

This is how the term yield farming came to be coined. It was not democratised with the proliferation of governance tokens throughout the DeFi ecosystem.

Subsequently, centralised exchange platforms began to propose yield farming strategies, for fear of being overtaken by the craze for decentralised protocols.

So what is yield farming?

As we have seen, yield farming refers to strategies aimed at optimising the yields generated by the cryptomoney deposited on the various DeFi protocols.

For a long time limited to deposits on a single platform, yield farming strategies have since evolved to take advantage of the interweaving of the various DeFi protocols with the aim of adding up the rewards.

Opportunities and warnings

As with the ICO movement in 2017, the yield farming phenomenon includes as many good opportunities… as it does bad ones. For example, CoinGecko proposes a ranking of pools for yield farming. In this ranking, we find all types of returns ranging from a few percent per year to several thousand (!) depending on the strategy.

Several factors are therefore important to take into account.

First of all, it is important to look at the platform that proposes the strategy. Indeed, every day new DeFi platforms are being created, however not all of them are reputable. Some are even extremely risky to use because they are not audited.

Secondly, it is necessary to look at the assets involved in the pool. Once again, with these platforms often come governance tokens, most of them also unaudited.

In the end, to minimise the risks, we prefer audited and recognised platforms and cryptomoney. Of course, minimising risk leads de facto to minimising returns.

Yield farming strategies for all exchanges

You are probably aware that Ethereum is currently going through a phase of intense congestion. As a result, transaction costs have reached record levels on the network.

Due to these abnormally high fees, it is essential to adjust its yield farming strategies to ensure that our returns are not squandered on transaction costs.

To do this we will explore two totally different strategies.

Binance Liquidity Swap

The first solution is mainly aimed at users wishing to invest small amounts. The objective here will be to test yield farming, while ensuring that the returns are not entirely lost in transaction costs.

To do this, we will turn to centralised yield farming strategies, such as the one proposed by Binance with Binance Liquidity Swap.

With this new product, Binance is introducing a centralised version of a liquidity pool-based trading platform, based on the same model as the DEXs of decentralised finance.

At the time of writing, Liquidity Swap has 4 pools BUSD/USDT, USDT/DAI, BUSD/DAI and USDC/USDT which offer annualised returns between 5 and 20%.

Why is this strategy recommended for small exchanges like Bitcoin Cycle? Because it allows you to take part in yield farming without going through Ethereum. As a result, it allows you to take positions and recover your profits without paying the huge transaction fees charged by Ethereum.

Obviously, as this strategy goes against the adage „Not your keys, not your corners“, it is not recommended for people with large portfolios, or who are uncompromising about decentralisation.

Yearn and the yVaults

For this second yield farming strategy, we are going to turn to the Yearn decentralised protocol. As we will be using Yearn, this implies that we will have to pay Ethereum’s transaction costs and therefore this strategy will be better suited to medium to large portfolios.

Thus, Yearn offers several products called yVault. Each of these „vaults“ or safes is a programme that automatically optimises yield farming strategies on a given asset. Yearn offers a total of 9 yVaults:

  • ETH/WETH
  • YFI
  • yDAI+yUSDC+yUSDT+yTUSD (yCRV)
  • crvBUSD
  • crvBTC
  • DAI
  • TUSD
  • USDC
  • USDT

These nine safes offer annualised returns ranging from 0.05 to 13.28%, at the time of writing.

In practice, the vaults will use the assets they contain by depositing them in the protocol(s) with the best returns. To calculate the best return, the yVaults take into account the interest generated by the protocols, incentive rewards and governance tokens earned through liquidity mining.

For example, when using the DAI vault it can: deposit the DAIs on Compound which will result in the generation of cDAIs. Then deposit the freshly generated cDAIs on Balancer. In the end, this allows you to earn COMP tokens on the DAI deposited on Compound and BAL tokens on the cDAIs deposited on Balancer, in addition to the interest provided by Compound and the transaction fees collected from the Balancer pool. A real cascade of investment, as some could already try with the Furucombo tool!

Some additional strategies

We will now detail a few more strategies to help you find the one that best suits your portfolio and your ideals. We will propose both centralised and decentralised strategies.

Centralised strategies :

  • Centralised loan and savings platforms such as BlockFi or Celcius. They will allow you to generate your first interest on your cryptos, without worrying about transaction costs.
  • Centralised liquidity pool trading platforms such as Binance Liquidity Swap. This allows you to generate interest via the transaction fees collected by the platform.

Decentralised strategies:

  • Centralised loan and savings platforms such as Compound or Aave. These allow interest to be generated on ERC-20s in a decentralised manner.
  • Decentralised exchange platforms such as Uniswap or Balancer. They allow interest to be generated thanks to the exchange fees recovered at the time of each swap.
  • Couple the previous strategies by adding rewards from liquidity mining. In this case, it is equivalent to depositing cash in pools benefiting from the liquidity mining process on Compoud, Uniswap or Balancer in order to generate governance tokens, in addition to the rewards mentioned above.
  • Use the Yearn yVaults that automatically compose between all the decentralised strategies presented above.

As we have just seen, there are a multitude of strategies to take part in yield farming, whatever the thickness of your portfolio. Nevertheless, it is important to remain vigilant before taking part in these strategies at the risk of making irreversible mistakes.

Fidelity forklarer, hvordan Bitcoin kan vokse til et billion dollar-marked

Fidelity Digital Assets udgav sin Bitcoin Investment Thesis og argumenterede for, hvorfor et billion-dollar BTC-marked ikke er en skør idé.

I tider med pandemi, usikkerhed og risiko er eksponering for nye investeringer mere en nødvendighed snarere end en anbefaling. Ifølge Fidelity, en af ​​de største mæglere i USA, er Bitcoin en fremragende investering for dem, der overvejer at forlade banker og komme ind på markederne.

I oktober 2020 udgav Fidelity Digital Assets, en gren af ​​Fidelity med fokus på kryptomarkederne, en rapport med navnet „Bitcoin Investment Thesis: Bitcoins rolle som en alternativ investering.“ I det analyserer de Bitcoins rolle som en investering, og hvad fremtiden kan bringe for verdens første kryptokurrency.

Og ting ser godt ud – for dem, der er villige til at tage risici.
Hvordan Fidelity ser Bitcoin i dag

For Fidelity tilbyder Bitcoin betydelige fordele i forhold til traditionelle finansielle instrumenter. Faktisk hævder de, at styrken af ​​den oprindelige kryptokurrency ligger i dens lave sammenhæng med ethvert andet aktiv i en investeringsportefølje.

Fidelity sammenlignede Bitcoins præstation med flere investeringer og fandt ud af, at sammenhængen mellem dem er minimal. Dette antyder, at Bitcoin faktisk fungerer som en uafhængig spiller og har sin egen særlige dynamik.

Du kan også lide:

Anthony Pompliano: Bitcoin-pris til $ 100.000 inden december 2021 (eksklusivt Pomp-interview)
Investment Giant Fidelity: Bitcoin er en butik af værdi
Troskab: 36% af institutionelle investorer ejer Bitcoin og andre kryptovalutaer

Dette er godt for investorer. Ifølge Fidelity kunne Bitcoin klassificeres som et alternativt aktiv, der giver hodlers mulighed for at beskytte deres formue ved at udsætte sig for en vare, for hvilken risikoen ikke afhænger af, hvad der sker med andre markeder.

Med andre ord er det en slags pude til en portefølje med diversificerede investeringer.

Fidelity anbefalede en investeringsstrategi på op til 5% af de samlede aktiver i Bitcoin. Folk skal købe eller sælge det, når andelen falder eller stiger. Dette skaber disciplin hos investorer og sikrer Bitcoins rolle som formueforøgelse:

”Overvej en portefølje med en målallokering på 5% bitcoin. Hvis bitcoins tildeling stiger til 10% af porteføljen på grund af dens overskud i forhold til andre aktiver, vil en disciplineret genbalanceringsstrategi diktere salg af bitcoin for at bringe sin allokering tilbage til 5% -målet og bruge midlerne til at øge allokeringen til andre aktivklasser, som er kommet under deres målallokering. Hvis bitcoin underpresterer og falder til 1% af porteføljen, vil investorer købe bitcoin og sælge deres position i andre aktivklasser, der ligger over deres målallokering. En fordel ved genbalancering er, at det tvinger investorer til at have disciplinen til at købe lavt og sælge højt. ”

Hvordan fremtiden for Bitcoin ser ud

Fremtiden ser endnu mere lovende ud i øjnene på dem, der måske læser rapporten. Pengestrømme fra traditionelle investeringer til Bitcoin kan øge prisen og gøre BTC til mainstream-investering i stedet for kun at være et nichemarked.

Fidelity forklarer, at de nuværende forhold kan katalysere denne massive kapitalmigration:

”Hvis bitcoin skulle fange 5% af alternativmarkedet målt af CAIA, ville det svare til en stigende vækst på 670 milliarder dollars i dets markedsstørrelse. Hvis det skulle fange 10%, ville det udvide dets markedsstørrelse med $ 1,3 billioner. ”

I betragtning af at BTC’s udbud er begrænset, og dets inflationsrate er forudbestemt, vil en billion dollar kapitalisering antyde en eksponentiel prisstigning.

Fidelity har netop offentliggjort en rapport, der viser, hvordan TRILLIONER dollars kunne strømme ind i #Bitcoin i løbet af de næste par år.

En anden kritisk faktor at overveje er, at flere og flere institutionelle investorer bliver involveret i Bitcoin efterhånden som tiden går. Dette ville være godt for markederne, da det ville fjerne nogle forudfattede ideer, hvilket ville give den gennemsnitlige bruger større sikkerhed, når han investerer i mere noget mere rentabelt end de fastforrentede værdipapirer og produkter med lav volatilitet, der findes i dag.

Og i betragtning af at dette firma har mere end 3,3 milliarder dollars under ledelse, kan det være godt at lytte til, hvad de har at sige.

Combien de temps avant que Bitcoin ne soit réellement déconnecté des stocks ?

À maintes reprises, l’industrie des biens numériques a connu un effet domino. Au cas où vous l’auriez manqué, le 21 septembre, le prix de Bitcoin a baissé de 6,46 %, passant de 10996 dollars à 10286 dollars. Une petite reprise a été observée le 22, mais le 23, l’actif a encore diminué de 3,82 %.

Les vannes baissières du marché de la cryptographie ont été déclenchées par une baisse des actions européennes et des contrats à terme sur les actions américaines. Le DAX allemand, le CAC français ont tous été peints en rouge, saignant de 3% alors que les Futures liés à Wall Street(S&P 500) ont baissé de 2%.

Alors que la valeur du dollar américain augmentait, le Bitcoin Revolution s’est effondré, ramenant le vieux débat : les actifs cryptographiques seront-ils un jour sans corrélation avec le marché traditionnel ?

La réponse est claire : pas dans un avenir proche

Les marchés boursiers continuent à réagir pour les actifs numériques, principalement en raison de la position de la capitalisation boursière. Le marché de Bitcoin est actuellement 60 fois plus petit que celui de l’or.

De plus, la liquidité associée à Bitcoin n’est pas du tout comparable à celle de l’or et rend la CTB sensible aux vulnérabilités du marché dans la catégorie des actifs traditionnels.

En outre, une autre raison de ces derniers mois a été la présence d’une classe commune d’investisseurs. En plus de quelques-uns, les opérateurs accrédités qui investissent dans la cryptographie ont les mains sur les deux marchés : les actions et les cryptos. Il sera presque impossible de localiser un grand nombre d’investisseurs qui sont uniquement investis dans Bitcoin.

Maintenant, comment cela change-t-il ? C’est simple. Avec beaucoup de temps

Le récent rapport de Glassnode sur la chaîne suggère que le nombre d’entités actives moyennes mobiles de Bitcoin sur 90 jours a déjà dépassé ses précédents sommets, ce qui est un pas positif dans la bonne direction.

Quelle que soit la vitesse à laquelle Bitcoin a reçu ses louanges et a gravi les échelons de la crédibilité, la croissance organique prend du temps.

Actuellement, pour que Bitcoin puisse se distancer de l’impact des marchés traditionnels, il faut que les apports institutionnels soient plus importants.

L’investissement de MicroStrategy de près d’un demi-milliard est un début, mais il faudrait que plus d’une institution de ce type se rallient à Bitcoin pour vraiment sortir l’actif dans un contexte de non-corrélation constante.

La prochaine bulle Bitcoin résoudra-t-elle ce problème ?

Résoudre est un mot contextuel, mais il poussera certainement la CTB dans la bonne direction. Avec la hausse des prix, les entrées de capitaux vont recommencer à augmenter et avec le temps, la classe d’actifs collective va résister aux mouvements des actions traditionnelles.

Une divergence totale est encore très difficile, mais l’amélioration de la liquidité permettra d’obtenir un actif plus fiable dans Bitcoin.

Por que os portadores de Bitcoin Cash estão em busca de mais moedas gratuitas em novembro

A rede de Bitcoin Cash poderá sofrer um garfo duro em novembro e os detentores da BCH poderão receber moedas adicionais como resultado.

Os detentores de Bitcoin Revolution Cash (BCH) parecem ter a certeza de receber algumas moedas grátis neste mês de novembro, quando o confronto contínuo entre grupos díspares da comunidade da moeda atingirá seu clímax em uma guerra de haxixe e subseqüente divisão em cadeia.

O conflito no campo BCH surgiu quando o desenvolvedor líder, Amaury Séchet, anunciou a inclusão de um código na próxima atualização que veria 8% da recompensa do bloco Bitcoin Cash ser desviada diretamente para ele.

Bitcoin Cash Miner’s Tax To Trigger Chain Split

A Séchet sustenta que os desenvolvedores não podem sobreviver só de pão e que o FIP (Plano de Financiamento de Infraestrutura), ou imposto de mineiros, é uma forma razoável de financiar o desenvolvimento da moeda.

No entanto, isso não se deu bem com uma grande parte (talvez a maioria) da comunidade da moeda, que viu o movimento da Séchet como algo semelhante a uma tomada de poder.

Como Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash tem várias implementações de nós diferentes competindo para ser a mais popular, e sob o imposto do mineiro Séchet, apenas sua implementação particular (conhecida como ABC) receberia financiamento.

Vocal Bitcoin Cash apoiador e presidente executivo da Bitcoin.com, Roger Ver, expressou oposição aos planos da Séchet. Em 31 de agosto, Ver postou um tweet comparando as ações da Séchet com as de um planejador central de estilo soviético. Ele escreveu:

„Desviar parte da recompensa do bloco Bitcoin Cash para pagar uma única equipe de desenvolvimento é o sonho de um planejador central de estilo soviético tornado realidade“.

Estojo para a Defesa

O desejo da Séchet de ver o financiamento da Bitcoin Cash vir diretamente da própria moeda não é inédito no espaço criptográfico da moeda. O Dash tem um mecanismo semelhante em vigor, enquanto uma porcentagem das recompensas da mineração do Zcash vai diretamente para seus fundadores.

A Séchet argumenta que os desenvolvedores devem ser pagos pelo trabalho que realizam, caso contrário, o Bitcoin Cash corre o risco de não atingir seus objetivos. Desde então, ele começou a se referir àqueles que se opunham a seus planos como „Bitsheviks“, alegando que eles só querem algo em troca de nada.

O outro lado, a Séchet, afirma que ele deveria reunir doações ou criar um produto pelo qual o mercado livre o recompensaria. Alguns até argumentam que segurar moedas BCH deveria ser incentivo e recompensa suficientes em si, raciocinando que se o desenvolvedor fizer bem, também o fará a moeda.

Dividir a cadeia de novembro

Estima-se que 70% do poder de hash da Bitcoin Cash sinalizou suas intenções de ignorar a atualização do código ABC, enquanto que a Séchet ainda pretende fazer com que ela seja aprovada.

Ambos os lados desejam retratar o outro como aquele que está iniciando o garfo duro, já que ambos os lados esperam manter o símbolo do ticker BCH nas trocas após a divisão ocorrer.

De qualquer forma, qualquer um que tenha o Bitcoin Cash no dia 15 de novembro receberá uma quantidade igual de moedas grátis quando o garfo duro ocorrer. No entanto, o quanto qualquer uma das moedas valerá na sequência, é o palpite de qualquer um.

Crypto regulation aims to create uniform regulation

The European Commission has now officially published the announced Markets-in-Crypto-Assets Regulation. It is intended to regulate the trading of crypto values ​​uniformly across Europe so that the EU can assume a global pioneering role in this market segment.

On September 24th, the European Commission passed the regulation “Markets in Crypto Assets(MiCA) „published. It is intended to represent a uniform regulation of crypto values ​​that the EU member states have to apply without being implemented in national law. With a transition period of 18 months, the law can be expected to become legally binding at the end of 2022. The planned regulation has already been available to BTC-ECHO for two weeks , with which Dr. Sven Hildebrandt dealt for the first time.

Vanguard’s September Market Outlook

The USA, Europe and Asia were initially able to recover from the pandemic faster than expected. Trading volumes have recovered from their lows, and our leading indicator index is rising for the third month in a row. Read our latest market outlook for September >
powered by finative

The ordinance deals with the issue, trading, licensing requirements and supervisory powers of crypto values. Crypto values ​​are digital values ​​that are not or embody claims, but rather represent their own value. Usually, such values ​​are understood to be digital values ​​such as Bitcoin (BTC) or Ether (ETH).

But utility tokens, i.e. tokens representing usage and access rights, also fall under the EU regulation. In addition, so-called „asset-referenced“ tokens are affected: stable coins that represent fiat currencies must be prepared for stricter requirements. Significant stable coins such as the planned „Facebook coin“ Libra are subject to even stricter regulations. The reservations about stable coins are evident as, if the general public accepts them as a means of payment, they could compete with the euro.

The European Commission sees financial stability and the financial sovereignty of the central banks at risk from this type of crypto value. If a stable coin is based on a single fiat currency such as the euro (EUR) or US dollar (USD), it is referred to as an „e-money token“.

What are the planned crypto regulations?

The document is part of the European Commission’s „Digital Finance Package“. Since the economic acceptance of crypto values ​​is foreseeable, the institution wants to clarify rights and obligations, capital issues and activities. A supervisory authority is to be installed at the European level instead of at the national level. One would like to reduce fraud and theft based on blockchain technology.

Issuers will also publish a white paper prior to a token launch. However, this strategy paper does not have to be checked or approved by any authority. Small providers and offers for professional investors are exempt from this obligation. Tokens that are created through mining or that an issuer issues free of charge also do not require a white paper.

The 168-page paper also defines security standards and specifies requirements for the IT infrastructure. Service providers such as crypto exchanges, brokers and custodians only need to obtain approval from an authority – then you can operate throughout the EU. Expectations of them have not yet been specified.

Bitcoin Miner affirme que Twitter a remis un compte interdit à Cameron Winklevoss

Le mineur de Bitcoin Cameron Asa a déclaré que son précédent compte Twitter OG @Cameron avait été interdit pour comportement suspect.

Asa insiste sur le fait qu’il n’a rien fait de mal

Il affirme que le compte est désormais le compte vérifié du cofondateur du milliardaire Gemini, Cameron Winklevoss.

Le Trust Project est un consortium international d’organisations de presse établissant des normes de transparence.

Le mineur de Bitcoin Cameron Asa affirme que Twitter a mis fin à tort à sa possession du pseudo Twitter @Cameron et l’a remis au co-fondateur de Gemini, Cameron Winklevoss.

Asa a affirmé dans un tweet supprimé depuis qu’il avait créé @Cameron «il y a bien plus de 10 ans», mais Twitter a inexplicablement interdit le compte et repoussé toutes les tentatives de s’engager pendant deux ans.

Selon Asa, Twitter n’a jamais donné de raison solide pour interdire son compte. Il insiste sur le fait qu’il n’a rien fait de mal, mais la plateforme a délibérément ignoré ses tentatives de faire appel de son interdiction jusqu’à ce que suffisamment de temps se soit écoulé pour que la poignée soit légalement réaffectée.

A Twitter OG (Original Gangster) compte est un type de compte Twitter qui est particulièrement souhaitable et en demande parce que la poignée est courte et mémorable. Des exemples de comptes Twitter OG sont @David , @Jack , @ 0x et @Cameron .

Asa, qui travaille à plein temps en tant que mineur de bitcoin, dit qu’il n’a jamais été réellement informé de ce qu’il a réellement fait de mal pour obtenir l’interdiction. Il affirme que malgré ses contacts répétés au cours de la période, il a tout simplement été ignoré.

En février 2018, Twitter a annoncé une révision de sa politique sur l’automatisation et l’utilisation de plusieurs comptes avec une date limite de conformité du 28 mars. La politique visait à lutter contre la prolifération des comptes de marionnettes chaussettes et les faux engagements sur la plateforme. Cela a entraîné une purge de jusqu’à 70 millions de comptes jugés suspects ou non authentiques.

Asa affirme que tandis que d’autres personnes ayant à la fois des comptes personnels et parodiques ont perdu leurs comptes parodiques, il a perdu son compte personnel. Ce faisant, dit-il, il a été bloqué hors de son compte et incapable de tweeter jusqu’à ce que suffisamment de temps se soit écoulé pour que la poignée soit légalement modifiée et réaffectée.

Twitter réattribue apparemment un compte à Cameron Winklevoss

Asa dit qu’il pense que ses tentatives pour prouver son innocence ont été intentionnellement ignorées afin que Twitter puisse donner son compte à Winklevoss.

«Nous encourageons les gens à se connecter activement et à utiliser Twitter lorsqu’ils créent un compte. Pour garder votre compte actif, assurez-vous de vous connecter et de tweeter au moins tous les 6 mois. Les comptes peuvent être supprimés définitivement en raison d’une inactivité prolongée. “

BeinCrypto a contacté Winklevoss pour obtenir des commentaires, mais nous n’avons pas pu établir de contact avec lui au moment de la publication. En attendant, un coup d’œil sur la page Twitter de Winklevoss confirme qu’il est bien l’actuel propriétaire du handle @Cameron.